Home » Technology » LED Technology » Quantum well thickness impacts efficiency of InGaN/GaN green LEDs

Quantum well thickness impacts efficiency of InGaN/GaN green LEDs

Quantum well thickness impacts efficiency of InGaN/GaN green LEDs
Quantum well

By BizLED Bureau

June 16, 2017: New research focusing on quantum well thickness in cyan green LEDs pave way for a better understanding of improving drop behaviour and bandwidth of LEDs For the past few years, there has been an improved focus on the impact of quantum well thickness in indium gallium nitride (InGaN)/GaN green LEDs on competence droop. Droop is the decrease of emission effectiveness with rising injection current in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum well (MQW) LEDs that can critically limit their use like high-brightness lighting sources.

Understanding quantum wells

Quantum wells are thin  layered semiconductor formations that derive majority of its properties from the quantum confinement of charge carriers in thin layers of a semiconductor ‘well’ matter squeeze in between an additional semiconductor barrier layers. Such physical effects may as well be subjugated in real devices and, therefore, are the focus of a lot of research plans. When the quantum well is extremely thin, the boost of InGaN well layer thickness improves the polarization effect, making competence droop more serious. Relatively, increase in quantum well thickness considerably lessens droop.

About the study

The researchers from the National Central University in Taiwan, University of California Santa Barbara, and National Cheng Kung University in Taiwan augmented the modulation bandwidth of InGaN LEDs and, it was found that decreasing the barrier thickness in the multiple quantum well active light-emitting areas improved bandwidth. The researchers claim record 3dB electrical-to-optical bandwidth values of almost 1GHz, as compared to other high-speed LEDs that administer less than 0.5GHz.

READ ALSO: New LED technology boosts Wi-Fi bandwidth tenfold

The researchers set out with an objective of increasing data rates for plastic optical fiber (POF) and visible-light communications with no equivalent increase in light-source price .Research involved evaluating devices with standard 17nm and thin 5nm barriers using LEDs  appropriate for POF apps.

Significant findings

The team pointed out that there are two distinctions in the active MQWs of the design. Firstly, it is the immense decrease in thickness of the GaN barrier layer in the tool structure from 17nm to 5nm. Thinning down the layer facilitated entire thickness of the active layer to decrease from 97nm to 37nm, enhancing the modulation speed of the device, radiative recombination rate and injected carrier density.

Quantum well thickness impacts efficiency of InGaN/GaN green LEDs

The device types were developed on patterned sapphire and the active area was just about 50μm in diameter, while the device dimensions were 0.75×0.86mm, which included contact pads on the sapphire substrate. By inserting the metal pads on insulating sapphire, resistor-capacitor (RC) setbacks are minimized, increasing bandwidth.

READ ALSO: Osram Opto launches LED optical sensor for smartwatch and wearable applications

Furthermore, the researchers said that equivalent output power of the devices at that temperature reveals that the thin barrier design does not considerably boost the likelihood of carriers escaping under high junction temperatures. The necessary driving current and fabrication price of GaN laser diodes are higher than would be needed for LED-based solutions. At 110°C, the bandwidths at 60mA were 0.64GHz for the standard MQW LEDs and 0.71GHz for thin barriers, the researchers added.

Pin It

One comment

  1. The competitive landscape of the market presents a very interesting picture. The market is witnessing new product launches, large scale collaborations, and agreements and partnerships across the value chain, with a number of tier-one players around the globe.

    Major players in the global quantum dot market include QD Vision, Inc. (U.S.), Nanosys, Inc. (U.S.), Nanoco Group Plc. (U.K.) among many others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*